

Why didn’t Chelsea call JTs bluff?
By: Rob | July 23rd, 2009
So it looks like John Terry is about ready to tell the world, that actually he was staying at Stamford Bridge all along. What’s bought this on? Well Chelsea are apparently deep in negotiations to give the England Captain a nice new fat contract. So just as I originally suggested, Terry was using Man City to get himself a bigger deal at his current one.
So why didn’t Chelsea just call his bluff and accept the £40m bid?
Lets be honest, straight off the bat, Terry is not worth that much money to anyone. He’s suffered alot from injuries the past few years, is getting older, and arguably isn’t even as good as Rickie Carvalho, who sits despondant on the Chelsea bench.
Had Chelsea accepted the offer, one of two things would have happened. Terry would have admitted he didn’t want a move in the first place and had to declare that he always wanted to stay at Chelsea, or they would have got 40 million quid for him.
Instead they couldn’t hold their nerve and will now be paying him even more than they were before. Seems a bit crazy to me.
I appreciate what Terry represents to the club, especially as captain. He is along with Lampard the face of the club for better or worse and a strong reminder of the Mourinho era. Maybe though, Chelsea need to try and move past their Jose complex. There have been a few occasions over the last few years where it has seemed they could do with moving on, as hard as that seems to be.
I also appreciate that Roman doesn’t need the £40m, and it almost means as little to him as it does to Manchester City. But having said that, he seems less and less willing to put big money into the club for transfers anymore, so if he could have just taken that £40m and chucked it Carlo’s way, he could have started building a team himself out of it, instead of trying to force a team out of the players Scolari and Hiddink left behind.
Chelsea do need to restablish themselves and with United seemingly weakened (Valencia and Owen in for Ronaldo?) now might be the time for them to reclaim their position at the top. But only if they stop fantasising about the Special One era.
From City’s perspective, Terry would have been a great marquee name, but its no big loss for them if Terry decides to stay – they should have gone after Carvalho anyway. And they’ll probably get Lescott instead which isn’t bad. Things are looking quite good for City at the moment.
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to England | |||
| EPL Scores | English Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



It seems that most people were too fooled by the sensationalism of brash Manchester City attempting to buy England’s Brave John Terry along with their motley crew of strikers to see what was really going on. John was never tempted by City’s absurd wealth on offer; what the massively absurd offer did, however, was put him in an unbelievable bargaining position for a raise. Breaking his silence would have put that position in jeopardy. That’s how business works: the monetary interest took his worth to another level, so in essence he could claim he deserved that raise. In reality, John is only worth that amount (and perhaps more) to Chelsea because he is Chelsea. He’s a brilliant player, but more importantly he’s bursting with passion belied by his calm demeanor.
People make a big fuss about sportsmen and their enormous fortunes, but there’s no ethical difference between them and any other wealthy professionals who play another sort a game. At least these athletes bring so much joy and emotion into our lives, which is more than I can say for the corporate fatcats who hypnotize us to buy their products.
On a last note, City did succeed in promoting their profile, and I am curious to see where they are by the end of the season. United to drop from the top four. Chelsea’s year.
Posted from
United States

-



I’m not having a go at JT at all, by the way, as you say Dave he played it right. But I question Chelsea – they could have called his bluff and saved themselves having to offer him a new contract
Posted from
United States

-



I swear to god it’s like I was the only one who knew John Terry wasn’t going anywhere. You can see it in the way he plays. EBJT is Chelsea through and through. He bleeds Chelsea’s blue, every game day in and day out. He wears the captain’s armband with great pride, which is why he was so heartbroken to have slipped and missed a penalty that would have brought us the Champions League trophy which still eludes us. I knew from the very moment of this huge press magnet story he wasn’t going anywhere.
Now, onto the other comments about EBJT being a relic of the “Mourinho era”. EBJT is not called England’s Brave John Terry for nothing. He is the epitome of the English style of football – heart, commitment, and physicality. He’s strong on the ball, stronger in the air, and a natural born leader. Chelsea keeps John Terry for those reasons, NOT because we’re trying to keep memories of Mourinho around. Keep in mind that Lampard, Joe Cole, Drogba, Essien, Ballack, and Carvalho were all part of Mourinho’s squads. But you don’t cite them, even though some of them have arguably had larger dips in form than EBJT ever had (cough, Drogba, cough, Ballack).
Now, being a Chelsea supporter means that I pretty much always think that it’s Chelsea’s year to win the quadruple. My love for the club blinds me pretty often. I was SURE we’d win it when we imported Ballack and Shevchenko. I was SURE we’d win it when Drogba went on his insane goal scoring spree. I was SURE so many times and many times I was wrong. But I can’t help myself but say it again – I think this year there is NO ONE who can stop us but ourselves. If Chelsea starts the season with the right mindset, temperance, and ambition, then the Champions League, the league, the FA cup, and the Carling Cup our going to be ours.
BUT. I have been wrong before.
Posted from
United States

-



It would have been interesting to see what would have happened but Chelsea can’t be seen to accept that any of their top players are touchable.
Posted from
United States

-



“Now, onto the other comments about EBJT being a relic of the “Mourinho era”. EBJT is not called England’s Brave John Terry for nothing. He is the epitome of the English style of football – heart, commitment, and physicality. He’s strong on the ball, stronger in the air, and a natural born leader. Chelsea keeps John Terry for those reasons, NOT because we’re trying to keep memories of Mourinho around. Keep in mind that Lampard, Joe Cole, Drogba, Essien, Ballack, and Carvalho were all part of Mourinho’s squads. But you don’t cite them, even though some of them have arguably had larger dips in form than EBJT ever had (cough, Drogba, cough, Ballack).”
I only didn’t site them because they haven’t been in the news for a transfer. All I’m referring to anyway is that any of the players who are asked “who’s the best manager you’ve played under” they always answer Mourinho. They just seem to be struggling to get past him is all – If I was coming in as Chelsea manager, I’d want to be building my own team – I’d get shot of Ballack and Drogba as well.
Everyone seems to have sort of missed the point anyway – I know JT was never going to leave Chelsea, that’s The Point. If Chelsea knew, they could have called his bluff.
Posted from
United States

-



Is it gay that my first response to this had nothing to do with JT, but was rather “Damn, where can I get that jacket?”
Erm… well?
Posted from
United States

-



John Terry and Frank Lampard were both around before Mourinho, so your argument doesnt really make any sense
Posted from
United States

-



I think Terry was considering moving but ultimately Anchelotti wanted to keep him around.
Carlo was very clever to publicly say Terry is the face of Chelsea, the captain of chelsea ….etc.
Puts pressure
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



pusillanimous let me make it crystal clear then. Chelsea are still defined by José. Terry has spoken in the press repeatedly over the last couple of years about how amazing Jose is, as have Lampard, and a few others. That was all.
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.












